11th Gen Civic Forum banner
21 - 40 of 63 Posts
This is correct, they’re housed behind a plastic cover so any installer with even half a brain would cut the tint around the housing.
The good tint places like I went to use tint that is computerized cut to fit, the front windshield strip was two pieces, one on each side of all the electronics and whatnot. You can't really tell by looking it fits so well.
 
Not only is tinting the windshield illegal for me (not that I would want to... I've done 90% windshield tint in my life and found even that level unsettling to drive on dark, windy roads at night), so is tinting the front and even rear passenger windows lower than 70% VLT, which is evidently the factory tint level

However, the factory tint has that greenish tinge to it (or am I imagining it?) and I'd prefer a gray/smoky look to match the tinting to the rear windshield and the little quarter panel triangles.

Let's assume that a 90% tint would "pass muster" in terms of inspections and what not - would that also "grayify" the green?
 
Not only is tinting the windshield illegal for me (not that I would want to... I've done 90% windshield tint in my life and found even that level unsettling to drive on dark, windy roads at night), so is tinting the front and even rear passenger windows lower than 70% VLT, which is evidently the factory tint level

However, the factory tint has that greenish tinge to it (or am I imagining it?) and I'd prefer a gray/smoky look to match the tinting to the rear windshield and the little quarter panel triangles.

Let's assume that a 90% tint would "pass muster" in terms of inspections and what not - would that also "grayify" the green?
That's why I went with the Air 80--it's basically clear to me. There's an Air 70 that's a bit more bluish to my eyes (similar to a Mercedes windshield) that seemed a bit to extreme to me.
 
Not only is tinting the windshield illegal for me (not that I would want to... I've done 90% windshield tint in my life and found even that level unsettling to drive on dark, windy roads at night), so is tinting the front and even rear passenger windows lower than 70% VLT, which is evidently the factory tint level

However, the factory tint has that greenish tinge to it (or am I imagining it?) and I'd prefer a gray/smoky look to match the tinting to the rear windshield and the little quarter panel triangles.

Let's assume that a 90% tint would "pass muster" in terms of inspections and what not - would that also "grayify" the green?
I just had them put in an eyebrow. Does a nice job of reducing glare. It's already dark enough inside.
Image
Image
 
FWIW, the windows say "minimum 70% VLT" which means of course it could be higher. And maybe are?

When the out-of-state dealership I bought my car from included (required) doing the window tinting pre-delivery, I was leery of failing my state inspection which requires 70% VLT in the front (even for rear passenger windows) and told them to make sure whatever tint the did would be at 70% in the end, but to put 35% tint film on the rear hatch and the pillar cutout windows.

Since you guys said it was 70% from the factory, I assumed this meant they'd left my passenger windows alone.

When I got the car, I thought my passenger windows looked a little tinted, but figured "I guess that's what 70% looks like?" Since in the past I've tinted to "darker than legal but not that dark" in the front (adding 50% tint film), until two years ago when I got ticketed and failed inspection for that (had to remove it).

Anyway, after passing inspection, I went to a local tint shop last week to add a 20% glare strip "eyebrow" tint to my windshield, and to see if I could get away with darkening my passenger windows after inspection to around, say, 50% net by adding 70% film (70% x 70% = 49%). But he immediately said, "well, it looks like it's 50% already to me". And indeed, they measured to 56% VLT.

So the factory tint on my car must have been around 80% and the dealership just used 70% tint film (instead of "ending on 70%" as I'd asked), because 70% film x 80% stock = 56%.

That, or it was 70% from the factory and they had some 80% film which is the same math in reverse. Most shops carry a lineup of 90% / 70% / 50% / 20% / 5%, but I think 3M film does come in 80% too?

But my best guess is, they wrote down "passenger windows to 70%" and handed it off to someone else for tinting who just slapped 70% tint on (probably thinking it was pointlessly light, too), which would mean the factory tint is more like 80% VLT.

Anyway I had passed inspection with this setup despite being "technically illegal", probably because the car was brand new from the dealership and looked stock (so lightly tinted) so they probably didn't do the actual measurement. Heh. Gonna remember where I went to for that.

And you know what? I like it. It looks perfectly nice in shadow, on a cloudy day, or at night. It's only in direct daylight that the windows look clear. And it's not like I live in a sunny desert!

Parked in the shade in the daytime:

Image


Image


Image



And street parked in direct sunlight, after adding the windshield "eyebrow" and the sunroof shade pulled over, it's "tastefully darkened" (dare I say, "elegantly" darkened?):

Image


(BTW the six inches shaved off the car length in the hatchback vs. the sedan sure helps with the street parking in NYC. An Audi A4 struggled and then gave up trying to parallel park there, not me!)
 
I went for a cheap one for 160 it's called solar free sentry carbon on my white 2022 civic sport. I did 5 percent total dark in the back and the lightest in the front so I do not violate the California's law. However, I have seen several illegal tints on the road and the cops do not ticket for it. I remember my dad got a ticket in the 90s because the used civic he bought had a total black tint job that was illegal. Depending on the city the cop can always cite you for it. I'm still waiting for it to cure.
 
FWIW, the windows say "minimum 70% VLT" which means of course it could be higher. And maybe are?

When the out-of-state dealership I bought my car from included (required) doing the window tinting pre-delivery, I was leery of failing my state inspection which requires 70% VLT in the front (even for rear passenger windows) and told them to make sure whatever tint the did would be at 70% in the end, but to put 35% tint film on the rear hatch and the pillar cutout windows.

Since you guys said it was 70% from the factory, I assumed this meant they'd left my passenger windows alone.

When I got the car, I thought my passenger windows looked a little tinted, but figured "I guess that's what 70% looks like?" Since in the past I've tinted to "darker than legal but not that dark" in the front (adding 50% tint film), until two years ago when I got ticketed and failed inspection for that (had to remove it).

Anyway, after passing inspection, I went to a local tint shop last week to add a 20% glare strip "eyebrow" tint to my windshield, and to see if I could get away with darkening my passenger windows after inspection to around, say, 50% net by adding 70% film (70% x 70% = 49%). But he immediately said, "well, it looks like it's 50% already to me". And indeed, they measured to 56% VLT.

So the factory tint on my car must have been around 80% and the dealership just used 70% tint film (instead of "ending on 70%" as I'd asked), because 70% film x 80% stock = 56%.

That, or it was 70% from the factory and they had some 80% film which is the same math in reverse. Most shops carry a lineup of 90% / 70% / 50% / 20% / 5%, but I think 3M film does come in 80% too?

But my best guess is, they wrote down "passenger windows to 70%" and handed it off to someone else for tinting who just slapped 70% tint on (probably thinking it was pointlessly light, too), which would mean the factory tint is more like 80% VLT.

Anyway I had passed inspection with this setup despite being "technically illegal", probably because the car was brand new from the dealership and looked stock (so lightly tinted) so they probably didn't do the actual measurement. Heh. Gonna remember where I went to for that.

And you know what? I like it. It looks perfectly nice in shadow, on a cloudy day, or at night. It's only in direct daylight that the windows look clear. And it's not like I live in a sunny desert!

Parked in the shade in the daytime:

View attachment 5516

View attachment 5517

View attachment 5518


And street parked in direct sunlight, after adding the windshield "eyebrow" and the sunroof shade pulled over, it's "tastefully darkened" (dare I say, "elegantly" darkened?):

View attachment 5519

(BTW the six inches shaved off the car length in the hatchback vs. the sedan sure helps with the street parking in NYC. An Audi A4 struggled and then gave up trying to parallel park there, not me!)
How's that guy behind you gonna get out, LOL
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: robardin and smulla
How's that guy behind you gonna get out, LOL
He had two feet clear behind him

Of course if the guy behind him left and someone else parked nose to his tail, he'd be kind of screwed, but it wouldn't be on me! [emoji51]

Plus I was only staying for like 2-3 hours, when I left nobody else had pulled out yet...
 
There are laws in my state that prohibits windshield tinting I can only do the front strip on the windshield. I decided not to do anything on the front windshield. The cops want to see you from the front if they are passing you on the freeway.

But hey if you know the cops or one yourself more power to you and if your state allows it.
 
There are laws in my state that prohibits windshield tinting I can only do the front strip on the windshield. I decided not to do anything on the front windshield. The cops want to see you from the front if they are passing you on the freeway.

But hey if you know the cops or one yourself more power to you and if your state allows it.
Law enforcement in my area don’t care about front windshield tint. I have had this done to every vehicle I have owned over the years. Plus, I have a written prescription for my tint. So I can’t get a ticket for it.
 
21 - 40 of 63 Posts